Victory Against Voter Discrimination: Court Overturns Arizona's Restrictive Voting Laws
PHOENIX – In Thursday’s ruling, the Arizona Federal District Court invalidated key sections of Arizona’s controversial voting laws, marking a significant victory for voting rights advocates and naturalized citizens of Arizona. The decision comes after a consolidation of eight lawsuits, highlighting a united front against voter suppression efforts that sought to impose unnecessary burdens on voters under the guise of election integrity.
"We applaud the Court for its decisive action in upholding the rights of all Arizona voters," stated Secretary of State, Adrian Fontes. "Today’s opinion dismantles a blatant attempt to suppress the votes of Arizona’s diverse electorate. This ruling reaffirms that voter suppression has no place in our democracy, and attempts to disenfranchise citizens are a solution in search of a problem."
This ruling affirms that Arizona cannot mandate the inclusion of an individual's place of birth on state voter registration forms, nor can it reject registrations that lack documentary proof of residence. Instead, Arizonans without such documentation will be registered as Federal-Only voters if they are otherwise eligible. However, a qualified voter who wants to vote a full state ballot must provide documentary proof of residency.
The Court found that these provisions not only violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) but also contravened the Civil Rights Act (CRA). This decision underscores the principle that naturalized citizens should not face undue hurdles in exercising their fundamental right to vote.
The Court's ruling emphasizes that the information such as the place of birth is not necessary to determine voter eligibility, thereby protecting voters from needless disenfranchisement. It also marks a clear rejection of the 'Reason to Believe' provision of H.B. 2243, which unfairly targeted naturalized citizens, as a violation of both the NVRA and the Civil Rights Act.
The decision is a reminder of the precious time and resources wasted on efforts that seek to erode civil liberties rather than protect them. "Arizona may not reject State Form registrations that lack an individual’s state or country of birth and must register an individual if that individual is found eligible to vote," the Court declared, setting a precedent for other states attempting to enact similar restrictive laws.
Click here to see the Court’s Amended Order.
–30–